“Account suspension. Verify now”: using systemic-functional linguistics to improve phishing text advisories for vulnerable groups

Digital scams are a reality of a connected society, and vulnerable populations, particularly the elderly and individuals from non-English speaking (NESB) backgrounds, face significant risks. These groups often struggle to recognise scam tactics due to technological and language barriers, rendering them susceptible to cyberfraud victimisation. By comparing 106 phishing text messages in Australia with legitimate text messages sent by frequently imitated organisations, this exploratory study examined the threat of phishing text messages, which account for substantial financial losses and reduced wellbeing globally.

Through an analysis applying systemic-functional linguistics (SFL), the study identified linguistic features grounded in social engineering techniques that manipulate phishing recipients. Results of the analysis showed that different clause types; time, location, and manner markers; high modality; and conjunctive use, were influential in creating urgency and authority, and are likely to manipulate phishing recipients through emotional and cognitive pressure. Many current advisory resources offer generalised advice and explanations of scam tactics, yet fail to include concrete examples of such communications.

By aligning linguistic analysis with human behavioural constructs and public policy, the results of this study have implications for the protection of vulnerable community groups from growing cyber threats through enhancing advisory content, and by developing automated scam detection systems. The author would like to thank Transport NSW and TransLink for their specific assistance and support during the data collection stage. This research was supported by funding from the Griffith University Centre for Social and Cultural Research.

This was part of the GCSCR ECR Seed Funding Grant Scheme 2024, an internal grant at Griffith University. This research was supported by Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research funding. Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.

Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia The author declares no competing interests. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author. This study did not involve human participants or their data and was not applicable to conducting the research.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it.