Newly filed court documents obtained by Newsweek show the estate of the late country music star Dolly Parton is supporting its case against her nephew Bryan Seaver using emails he allegedly sent. The legal battle stems from a breakdown in the relationship between Seaver, who served as his aunt's security chief, and She's Alive LLC, the company established to manage Parton's estate following her death. Earlier court filings accused Seaver of threatening and intimidating people connected to Parton's business interests, allegations he has denied.
Newsweek contacted Parton's representative via email for comment on Wednesday. Among the exhibits in the newest round of court documents is an August email Seaver allegedly sent to a contractor involved with a Nashville property connected to Parton's estate. The email criticized work on a project, complained about delays and used insulting language toward the recipient.
It also warned that "my lawyers" would become involved if the dispute escalated. That message has drawn attention because Seaver later told the court he needed additional time to secure legal representation. Attorneys for the estate highlighted the apparent inconsistency, arguing that his prior communications suggested he already had lawyers available to assist him.
As of October 6, court records indicate Seaver has retained counsel. A Notice of Appearance filed on Tuesday shows attorneys Dominic J. Collier entering the case on behalf of Seaver and Squadron Augmented Protection Services (SAPS), the security company named as a co-defendant.
Newsweek contacted Leonardo and Collier for comment via email on Wednesday. The filings include a series of emails in which Seaver allegedly expressed frustration over security, staffing and construction-related matters at a Nashville development. One email the estate cited accused contractors of failing to meet obligations and said the project was plagued by delays and regulatory issues.
Another message allegedly criticized a contract security provider and questioned its performance. The most aggressive correspondence contains profanity-laced attacks directed at a contractor. According to the filing, Seaver warned that legal action could follow and suggested damaging information about the project could be made public if his concerns were not addressed.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
