A family business can spend a century building trust and lose it in a single generation. Leaders quite often confuse ownership with responsibility. The company carries their name, their history, and perhaps four generations of family sacrifice, so they begin to believe its future should follow their wishes.
Yet a business is a living institution, sustained by employees who give it their working lives, customers who trust its products, and suppliers who depend on its stability. Its owner may hold the shares, but the consequences of its decisions belong to a much wider community. This is why succession deserves far more attention than it receives.
Deloitte’s 2026 global family business research found that 40 percent of family businesses expect a CEO change within the next decade, while only 46 percent have broad, well-developed succession plans. Those figures reveal a dangerous gap between knowing change is coming and preparing for it. Passing the business to a son, daughter, or another relative is a decision about ownership.
Preparing someone to protect its people and future is a decision about leadership. I lead a family-owned automotive chemicals company with four generations of my family behind it. I also have a newborn son, and I would love to give him the opportunity to choose whether he wants to be part of the business someday.
That choice matters to me because my responsibility is to leave him an opportunity, not an obligation. The company must be worth inheriting, whoever eventually leads it. My understanding of leadership has also been shaped by people outside my family.
I have learned from leaders whose experience, judgment, and ability to bring people together have challenged my own assumptions. A surname cannot guarantee competence, just as a different surname cannot diminish it. The leader best equipped to take a company forward may be the person who has earned the trust of its people and understands its customers most deeply.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
