This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Fieldwork is a vital part of geoscience research, allowing scientists and students to directly observe, interact with and collect data about Earth processes that cannot be replicated in the lab. Because fieldwork involves traveling to remote locations and living in close quarters under demanding conditions, it can also lead to circumstances in which personal boundaries are crossed or safety is compromised.
Shared housing, uneven power structures between students and professionals, remote locations and long workdays can increase the likelihood of harmful field interactions. Although the National Science Foundation, the largest agency funding field-based research, provides safety guidelines for fieldwork, many researchers in the geosciences report a range of problematic behaviors, from bullying to discrimination to sexual harassment. Gold and team conducted an anonymous survey of 289 AGU members to assess the frequency of harmful field interactions (excluding severe cases of violence or misconduct), which types have the greatest impact and why incidents may go unreported.
The researchers also asked participants what could be done to make geoscience field research safer and more inclusive. The findings are published in the journal AGU Advances. In the survey, participants were asked whether they had experienced or witnessed harmful behaviors, including aggression and hostility, social harassment, undermining of work, inappropriate sexual behavior, assumptions and stereotyping, and violations of personal privacy.
Participants identified instances and provided additional details, such as whether they experienced or observed the harmful behavior, the relationship between perpetrator and victim, the career stage at which the event occurred, whether the field site was in a remote or accessible location, and whether the incident was reported. Eighty percent of survey participants reported experiencing at least one harmful field interaction during fieldwork; the average respondent reported five harmful interactions. Though identity-based harmful behaviors, such as inappropriate sexual behavior and assumptions or stereotyping, were commonly reported, respondents consistently identified behaviors related to professional conduct, such as gatekeeping, sabotage and devaluation of work, as having the most negative impact.
Women and nonbinary researchers were disproportionately affected by devaluation of their work, bullying, unwanted sexual attention and invasions of privacy. Career stage also affected study respondents: Early-career researchers were more likely to face incidents such as uncomfortable sleeping situations and pressure to drink alcohol. Some harmful behaviors, such as pressure to engage in unsafe activities and bullying, were more common at remote worksites.
Seventy-five percent of the most impactful instances went unreported, highlighting a need for improved safety and inclusion training, enforced codes of conduct and independent reporting pathways to ensure that geoscience fieldwork can be safe, fair and ethical for all participants. Gold et al, Examining Harmful Field Interactions in Geoscience Fieldwork and Strategies for Change, AGU Advances (2026). DOI: 10.1029/2026av002402 MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
