This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Researchers at the University of Sydney have harnessed more than 30 years of data to build a new method to more accurately measure the impact of climate change-induced events on the Great Barrier Reef. The findings are published in the journal Marine Environmental Research.
Their framework quantifies reef degradation over time and provides other researchers with a "health-check" tool to assess reef health. It can be used to measure the impact of severe disturbances, including coral bleaching, cyclones and floods, on reefs. Led by Ph.D. candidate Kate Whitton from the University's School of Geosciences and Marine Studies Institute, the framework draws on data dating to 1995 to evaluate how key parameters, particularly coral cover and algal buildup, have changed over time.
High coral cover indicates a reef can sustain healthy marine life populations, while high levels of algae point to poor reef health. The comparative benchmark was developed for three study reefs within the Great Barrier Reef: Lizard Reef, Low Isles Reef and One Tree Reef (where the University has a research station). Assessing reef health from absolute coral cover alone is difficult because healthy cover can vary widely among reef systems.
Instead, the research team compared each reef against its own historical data, which began being collected in the late 1980s by the Australian Institute of Marine Science. "A reef with 30% coral cover might be considered healthy in one location but indicate substantial decline in another," Whitton said. "Variation can depend on factors like exposure to ocean currents and proximity to shore.
"By comparing reefs against their own historical data, we can assess a reef's condition in a way that accounts for its idiosyncrasies. This allows us to compare reefs more consistently and better understand where they sit along their recovery trajectory." The research created three ecological categories for reefs—healthy, coping and struggling—based on changes in coral cover, algal dominance and reef composition. It found reefs generally transitioned into a "coping" state when coral cover declined below approximately 65% of their historical maximum.
Further declines below 35% were associated with a "struggling" state, characterized by increased algal buildup and substantial reductions in reef-building corals. The study found complex coral forms are more affected than simple, round corals when a reef is disturbed, resulting in a flattening of reefs as they approach "coping" and "struggling" states. A flat reef offers fewer nooks and crevices for fish to shelter and feed.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
