This study examines public perceptions of a national mandatory vehicle inspection program (Fahes, Qatar). It proposes a survey-based framework for assessing user attitudes toward its safety, environmental, technical, and service-related outcomes. Using a structured online questionnaire, the study combines descriptive analysis with structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine how personal characteristics, vehicle type, and inspection timing relate to a composite measure of safety-related risk behavior (traffic violations, crash involvement, maintenance neglect, and inspection failures) and to perceptions of the inspection system’s technical, environmental, and safety value.
Descriptive results showed generally positive attitudes toward the inspection system: most respondents reported confidence in its ability to detect vehicle defects and viewed it as contributing to road safety and to reducing vehicle emissions, and satisfaction with inspection services was an important correlate of trust in the system. SEM results showed that personal characteristics, particularly education, were significantly associated with this risk-behavior measure and with several dimensions of inspection-related perceptions. Risk behavior was, in turn, the construct most consistently associated with perceptions of the system, though not uniformly: respondents reporting more violations, crashes, maintenance neglect, and inspection failures rated the system’s technical and safety effectiveness significantly less favorably, but reported more favorable environmental perceptions and stronger support for more frequent inspection.
Vehicle type and inspection timing were also significantly associated with environmental perceptions and with satisfaction, respectively. As a cross-sectional, self-reported survey, this study describes user perceptions and their correlates rather than the inspection program’s objective effects on crashes or emissions; it offers policymakers and inspection authorities perception-based evidence to inform communication strategies and service design". The authors disclosed no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida Polytechnic University, Lakeland, FL, 33805, USA Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University, Pajoohesh Sq., Kerman, Iran Department of Civil Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar MAIC-QUT Road Safety Research Collaboration, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study involved human participants through an anonymous questionnaire survey examining public perceptions of the vehicle inspection system, including its safety, environmental, technical, and service-related aspects. Participation in the survey was voluntary, and respondents were informed about the purpose of the study before completing the questionnaire.
No personally identifiable information was collected, and all responses were recorded anonymously to protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality. Participants were informed that their involvement posed no foreseeable risk to their health, safety, or well-being and that they could choose whether or not to participate. Completion of the questionnaire was considered to constitute informed consent for participation in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
