sözaltı news Culture
Culture
EN AZ
‘Les Misérables’ Review: A Starry, Lavishly Empty, French-Language Version of Victor Hugo’s Epic

‘Les Misérables’ Review: A Starry, Lavishly Empty, French-Language Version of Victor Hugo’s Epic

variety.com 23.09.2026 21:42 4 views
Nobody sings in the latest adaptation of Victor Hugo’s 1462-page cinder-block classic, but the absence of rousing musical numbers does not mean that Fred Cavayé’s “Les Misérables” is going for gritty realism. The 179-min

Here we are again on the streets of poverty-blighted 19th-century France, this time watching Vincent Lindon, Tahar Rahim, Camille Cottin and Noémie Merlant not-sing their way through an anodyne, politically incurious take on the classic novel. Nobody sings in the latest adaptation of Victor Hugo’s 1462-page cinder-block classic, but the absence of rousing musical numbers does not mean that Fred Cavayé’s “Les Misérables” is going for gritty realism. The 179-minute film, enjoying a reported $37m budget and a host of Big French Stars trapped in starchily archetypal Big French Roles, spackles its resources across the screen in a manner that has come to stand in for “epic” (wide vistas of battlefields; gliding aerial angles on meticulous, digitally rendered 19th-century cityscapes; taverns and courtrooms teeming with costumed extras) but that actually just provides a lot of weightless distraction for how curiously unmoving it all is.

Three gusty hours of lots to look at and nothing to see. You do not have to be any stripe of “Les Misérables” fan — in fact, you don’t have to have read, seen, attended or listened to a single one of well over a century’s worth of books, movies, TV shows, theater adaptations, radio plays, musical productions and comics — to find Cavayé’s film familiar. The story of Jean Valjean’s decades-spanning beef with Inspector Javert is like chlorine in the water supply: you’ve ingested it whether or not you realize.

What is of note, however, is how little this version distinguishes itself from its predecessors, as though Cavayé, who makes efficient work of streamlining the book’s sprawl into just three hours, was aiming to create a kind of median, ur-“Misérables” against which all future “Misérables”-es could be measured. But in going for definitive, it ends up derivative, with cramped ambitions making a big production feel paradoxically small. Small enough to be better suited to a smaller screen — why this is not a streaming-service miniseries is anyone’s guess, especially given Netflix is a production partner.

The casting is less perplexing. The role of Valjean, previously taken in Francophone versions by Jean Gabin, Jean-Paul Belmondo and Gerard Depardieu among other luminaries, is practically an earned honor at this point, a medal that can pinned to the chest of any French actor maturing into his “national treasure” phase. Vincent Lindon certainly fits that bill; it’s less clear if he fits with newbie actor Ryan Fartout who plays hot, young Valjean, whose rippling musculature is, as the film begins, being heartlessly exploited in construction labor. (Presumably because it will be 200 years until Calvin Klein launches their Eternity fragrance and needs him to model for it.) Valjean’s famous bread-theft-to-feed-his-starving-family here becomes a footchase/fight setpiece before he is caught and consigned to an ever-lengthening prison sentence.

Eventually released, the resentful ex-con experiences a Damascene conversion due to the Christian compassion of Monseigneur Myriel (Frédéric Pierrot). Years later, Valjean, now played by Lindon, has reinvented himself as M. Madeleine, the deeply decent proprietor of a glass factory and the popular mayor of Montreuil.

Javert (Tahar Rahim) has been on a different trajectory. He becomes crueler as he rises through the law enforcement ranks, spurred by self-hatred (he smashes a lot of mirrors) and frequent apparitions of his mother, who forced him into thievery as a boy and then abandoned him when he got caught pilfering a pocket watch — just one of several such timepieces that pop up throughout “Les Misérables” as a symbol of wealth, but also a reminder of all the time that is passing while you are watching “Les Misérables.” Which is not, to be fair, to suggest that the film is laggardly. Edited at a brisk clip by Mickael Dumontier, urged along by Christophe Julien’s adventure-and-action-pummelled score, it skims quickly along the surface of the narrative, unburdened by subtext or psychological complexity or socio-political texture.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story