Ten years ago, Alastair Harper was an advocate for young people’s health sitting in a stuffy meeting room in London planning an air pollution campaign. My own child was headed there in a blue-lit ambulance because she was struggling to breathe London’s toxic air.” Hundreds of thousands of parents across the UK capital had similar experiences in those years. Between about 6,000 and 8,000 people were dying prematurely each year in London in the late 2010s.
In 2020, an inquest found that the death of Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah in 2013 had been a direct result of air pollution, the first time it had been listed as a cause of death in the UK. This week, a study from Queen Mary University London (QMUL) showed a significant reversal. Children’s lungs had grown bigger and stronger since the most polluting vehicles have been restricted on the capital’s roads, scientists found.
The ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) – introduced by London’s mayor Sadiq Khan in 2019 and expanded in 2021 and 2023 – charges £12.50 a day for more polluting vehicles that do not meet stringent standards. It has drastically cut levels of nitrogen dioxide, a harmful pollutant. To Harper, who later worked for Khan as an environmental adviser, and now works independently, relief at his own child’s recovery has been supplemented by the satisfaction of knowing that far fewer parents will experience such dread.
Nick Hopkinson, a professor of respiratory medicine at Imperial College London, said the QMUL study was not a surprise. Air pollution kills 7 million people a year globally, according to the World Health Organization. Poor air not only causes respiratory difficulties and the stunting of children’s lungs, but also heart disease and stroke.
It is associated with some forms of cancer, dementia, autism and cognitive difficulties in children too. New studies are adding to our knowledge, but we have known for decades of the basic dangers of dirty air. So why is there so much opposition to curbs on air pollution, which are clearly sound public health measures?
This opposition, culture war even, is central for all cities hoping to follow Khan’s lead. The leading causes of air pollution vary around the world – coal use in power stations in China and India, agricultural burning in south-east Asia, waste burning in many of the poorest countries and dust and local industry in others – but road traffic is a constant. The technology to cut all of these types of air pollution already exists, says a former social development minister of Ecuador and now executive director of the Breathe Cities initiative, whose supporters include the Clean Air Fund and C40, a global coalition of mayors and leaders of nearly 100 major cities.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
