Judgements of responsibility are foundational to human social life. Adults judge responsibility by considering not just what someone chose to do, but also the alternative choices available to them. Thus, the development of adult-like responsibility judgements in children depends on their capacity to reason about counterfactual choices.
In this Review, we distinguish three key elements of this capacity: understanding that counterfactual choices are possible, successfully reasoning about counterfactual worlds, and identifying the most relevant counterfactuals in any given situation. This framework clarifies the relationship between counterfactual reasoning and responsibility judgements in childhood, identifies conceptually distinct elements of children’s understanding of responsibility, and opens up avenues for inquiry into an essential element of children’s social reasoning. This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout Alicke, M.
Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Bull. 126, 556–574 (2000). Counterfactual simulation in causal cognition.
A., Gerstenberg, T. & Zultan, R. Causal responsibility and counterfactuals. Sci. 37, 1036–1073 (2013).
Psychol. 39, 313–325 (2000). A., Sridhar, S. & Gerstenberg, T. A computational model of responsibility judgments from counterfactual simulations and intention inferences.
Cognitive Science Society Vol. 45 (2023). Xiang, Y., Landy, J., Cushman, F. A., Vélez, N. & Gershman, S.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
