sözaltı news Science
Science
EN AZ
Researchers in exile thrive in new academic settings when they contribute knowledge, not just receive aid

Researchers in exile thrive in new academic settings when they contribute knowledge, not just receive aid

phys.org 15.10.2026 02:00 7 views
Publishing scientific articles requires more than knowledge of academic writing conventions; it also depends on access to networks that support the research and publication process. Academic networks provide opportunitie

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Publishing scientific articles requires more than knowledge of academic writing conventions; it also depends on access to networks that support the research and publication process. Academic networks provide opportunities to exchange knowledge, receive feedback and develop collaborations that can strengthen both research and careers.

For researchers in vulnerable situations, such connections can be crucial. "For researchers in stable circumstances, networks are often seen as a route to academic excellence. For researchers in vulnerable situations, they can be a matter of survival," says Baraa Khuder, senior lecturer at Chalmers University of Technology and lead author of the study.

The study—"Academic Networking in Transition: Mapping Trajectories of Mobility and Precarity"—was conducted by Baraa Khuder, Chalmers University of Technology, and Bojana Petrić, University of London, and was recently published in Written Communication. The study is part of a three-year project on Syrian researchers in exile and their pathways into new academic environments. It explores how researchers build networks to support their efforts to write for scholarly publication.

The most important finding was that networks became stronger and more sustainable when researchers were able to contribute themselves. "We found that relationships became more enduring when researchers moved from being help-seekers to becoming collaborators, mentors or experts. They contributed methodological expertise, data, feedback and professional contacts of their own," says Khuder.

Progress often developed gradually. A single conversation could lead to an introduction, which in turn provided access to data or feedback on a manuscript. This could then develop into a new collaboration.

The networks led to publications, conference presentations, applications for research funding and access to data. One of the researchers also secured a postdoctoral position through their network. "We saw how what initially appeared to be a small step could, over time, lead to much more significant academic outcomes," says Khuder.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story