New technologies are implemented and associated policy decisions and public attitudes are solidified before research on the impacts of such technology is available. Psychologists must contribute to discussions about the use of generative AI for young children, using science-informed opinion to ensure benefits and prevent harm. This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout Hirsh-Pasek, K. et al.
Putting education in “educational” apps: lessons from the science of learning. Public Interest 16, 3–34 (2015). How educational are “educational” apps for young children?
App store content analysis using the Four Pillars of Learning framework. Media 15, 526–548 (2021). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bickham, D.
Pulse Survey: Use of Voice Assistants & Generative AI by Children and Families https://digitalwellnesslab.org/pulse-surveys/use-of-voice-assistants-and-generative-ai-by-children-and-families/ (Boston Children’s Hospital Digital Wellness Lab, 2024). Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Sci. 10, 110–120 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00572.x (2007).
Beyond the 30-million-word gap: children’s conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function. Sci. 29, 700–710 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617742725 (2018). Eulau, K. & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
From behavioral synchrony to language and beyond. Neurosci. 18, 1488977 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2024.1488977 (2024). Technoference: parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
