The UK’s decision to impose sanctions on Israel’s project to build illegal Jewish colonies on the occupied West Bank is economically meaningless, mostly impossible to implement but symbolically it is a seismic event. Britain’s 20th century history with Israel and the Palestinians has held a special grip on both communities at least since 1917 - the year when a Zionist dream was made real, on paper. The so-called Balfour Declaration, a letter sent by then Foreign Secretary James Balfour to Lord Rothschild, has been seen by the Arab world as the original betrayal, a colonial project that has saddled the region with misery.
For the many in the Jewish diaspora, it was the moment that an Imperial Government which was running Palestine made a “promise” to bring a Jewish State into being. Not so much the midwife as the IVF clinic for the conception of what is now Israel, Britain’s role was special then. And so its sanctions against Israeli settlements on Palestinian land captured by Israel in 1967 have a potency beyond their economic power.
The last Conservative government introduced legislation, in line with demands from Israel, that essentially argued that calling for Boycotts, Disinvestment or Sanctions (BDS) against Israel was anti-Semitic and should be banned. The bill was shelved by Sir Keir Starmer, but his government still maintained a policy of rejecting all and any BDS. The argument that economic sanctions of any kind against the Jewish State was an atavistic attack on all Jews has been a central part of Israel’s external policies for years.
It is a terrible argument that has been blown apart by the UK’s new legislation. But it is nearly impossible to impose a trade ban on the Jewish colonies of the West Bank when the goods they export are identified as being products of Israel. They’ll never say “produced in Palestine” because Israel says there is, and has never been, such a place.
So an importer, or a consumer, keen to comply with new legislation intended to stop the building of “E1” - a gigantic extension of Jerusalem that would bisect the West Bank and destroy territorial integrity for the Palestinians - may decide to boycott all Israeli products to avoid failure to comply with sanctions against settlements. This is the kind of creeping pressure that Israel is allergic to. And sets the UK on a collisions course with the government of Benjamin Netanyahu and the White House.
The latter has sanctioned jurists with the International Criminal Court for its indictment of Israel’s prime minister and then defence minister, Yoav Gallant, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. Their actions in Gaza where around 70,000 people were killed, of them more than 45,000 women and children, in Israel’s response to the October 7 2023 massacre of about 1,200 people by Hamas, has shocked liberal Jewish groups around the world who have campaigned for a “two state” solution of secure nations for Israelis and Palestinians, for years. On the West Bank, which Netanyahu wants to annex without its 2.5 million Palestinian population, Jewish militia have been forcing non-Jews from their homes in a violent campaign overseen by Israel’s security forces.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
