sözaltı news Finance
Finance
EN AZ
What history says about longer-term bond yields after the first Fed hike

What history says about longer-term bond yields after the first Fed hike

marketwatch.com 16.09.2026 11:11 4 views
If the Federal Reserve hikes interest rates in an effort to slow down the rapid rise in longer-term yields, history shows it probably won’t be a success.

What history says about longer-term bond yields after the first Fed hike What history says about longer-term bond yields after the first Fed hike Bond yields typically rise, meaning their value falls, after the first Fed hike of a cycle. /iStockphoto If the Federal Reserve hikes interest rates in an effort to slow down the rapid rise in longer-term bonds yields, history shows it probably won’t be a success. on worries over Middle Eastern oil supplies, has emerged as a major concern, even as core CPI on a year-over-year basis fell to its lowest reading since early 2021 in August. Citi’s global equity strategy team led by David Groman plotted the course of 10-year yields around first Fed hikes. With the notable exception of 1997 — when the Fed hiked once, went on hold, and then cut rates the following year due to contagion from the Asian financial crisis — the pattern is for yields to rise about 50 to 100 basis points in the year after the first Fed hike.

Video 91/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the adVisit Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE Vertiv's CEO on Nvidia, AI, Growth, and More Play video: Vertiv's CEO on Nvidia, AI, Growth, and More The pattern of 10-year yields after the first Fed hike Citi/DataStream/MSCI “While stocks tend to wobble around the first hike, it has typically paid to buy into any volatility with a one-year horizon. The same can’t be said for bonds, where it has generally paid to sell U.S. Don’t Short Yourself offers weekly money tips to help you earn it, stack it and grow it.

I agree to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and Cookie Notice. I would like to receive updates and special offers from Dow Jones and affiliates. I can unsubscribe at any time.

Former Fed governor and ex-Trump White House official Stephen Miran has been arguing, both on CNBC and on social media, that a hike would be counterproductive. Citrini’s James Van Geelen, in a Substack message, said a hike would help longer-duration government bonds. Copyright ©2026 MarketWatch, Inc.

All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8 What Altman, Amodei, Huang and Zuckerberg are saying about the raging AI debate These 4 stocks could benefit most from a $3.2 trillion semiconductor opportunity Medicare is using AI to approve claims. The result has been ‘alarmingly high denial rates.’ Why a Federal Reserve rate hike could be a ‘rare win’ for your retirement money Oracle’s stock falls for the fifth day in a row — missing out on the AI bounce Steven Goldstein is based in London and responsible for MarketWatch's coverage of financial markets in Europe, with a particular focus on global macro and commodities. Previously, he was Washington bureau chief, directing MarketWatch's economic, political and regulatory coverage.

Follow Steve on Twitter: @MKTWgoldstein. Intraday Data provided by FACTSET and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by FACTSET.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story