A federal judge has temporarily barred the Trump administration from cutting down additional trees at a D.C. municipal golf course, the latest example of a court intervening in the government's efforts to reshape pieces of the nation's capital. The long-simmering fight over East Potomac Golf Links — which President Trump wants to redevelop into a championship-level course — erupted over the weekend, after the administration cut down hundreds of trees with little notice. District Judge Ana Reyes had ordered the administration in May to get court approval before cutting down more than 10 trees at the golf course.
Officials notified the court just before 5 p.m. on Friday of their plan to remove "up to 529 trees" in phases starting on Saturday — and had razed at least 430 by the end of the day, prompting Reyes to call an emergency hearing on Monday. "What has happened has cost the government all of its credibility with me in this case," Reyes said during the nearly four-hour hearing, held via videoconference. Reyes ordered a short-term stop to the tree-clearings, which she extended on Tuesday through Oct. 26.
She warned Monday that "if that order is violated by two seconds, there are going to be contempt proceedings." Reyes also ordered top officials from the Department of Interior and the National Park Service to testify at a hearing next Monday, to shed more light on the government's motivations and the future of the historic course. "The questions go to whether or not I've been lied to," Reyes said. "Whether I've been lied to in declarations about the plans, whether or not I've been lied to about the timing of things, and whether I've been lied to about what kind of notice the court was going to receive." East Potomac has emerged as another flashpoint in Trump's unilateral quest to remake D.C., and it's the subject of a lawsuit by critics who fear it could go the way of the now-lost White House East Wing unless a court intervenes.
Preservation League, along with two concerned residents, sued the government in February over what it calls an unlawful takeover. "This is a tactic we're seen before from the Trump-Vance administration – act quickly to irrevocably alter a cherished national landmark, just to advance another one of President Trump's pet vanity projects," Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward — one of the firms involved in the lawsuit — said in a statement this weekend. Perryman told NPR on Tuesday that the golf course is the latest in a pattern of the Trump administration "undermining the entire checks and balances process in this country, which includes undermining court proceedings." Trump has long floated the idea of redeveloping East Potomac into a championship-caliber course and announced plans to do so earlier this year, though his target Sept. 1 start date has come and gone without a formal proposal.
The prospect — and the lack of clarity since — has raised alarm among locals concerned about losing access to the historically affordable course and to the surrounding recreational area, which is popular with cyclists, runners, fishers and picnickers. "This is a broader story than just about golf, especially when there's been this little transparency, … to say, 'Here's what the future of this little man-made peninsula is actually going to look like,'" Alex Rosen, a D.C.-based consultant who started the nonprofit Save East Po, told NPR in July. A National Park Service official said in a Friday court filing that plans for renovations "remain in the conceptual stage." And the Interior Department told NPR in a statement on Tuesday that it is "committed to continuing the relationships we have built with the local golf communities to ensure these courses are safe, beautiful, open, affordable, enjoyable, accessible, and world-class." But critics are growing increasingly concerned about the process itself.
They worry the Trump administration is using so-called routine maintenance as a pretext to begin redevelopment without the proper authorization. "You can't continuously say, 'There's no plan' … while you're clearly taking steps to effect a plan," Rosen, who is not involved in the lawsuit, told NPR after watching the hearing. "It's just frankly lying." At Monday's hearing, Reyes expressed regret that she hadn't issued a formal restraining order earlier, which she said was because "I have done everything humanly possible to give the government the benefit of the doubt in this case." For example, after the administration quietly removed what it has since said were roughly 150 dying and invasive trees in late August, Reyes acknowledged that people were upset but declined to intervene: "I am not the Lorax," she said at an early September hearing.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
