sözaltı news Politics
Politics
EN AZ
The Case for Corruption, Redux  

The Case for Corruption, Redux  

newsweek.com 23.09.2026 11:00 3 views
Readers were appalled by Trump’s $5,000 “dividend.” Perhaps a history lesson is in order

In 2014, the author and activist Jonathan Rauch wrote a wonderfully provocative essay under the mischievous headline “The Case for Corruption.” Rauch, a Brookings scholar who has subsequently been an emphatic critic of President Donald Trump, wasn’t suggesting that congressmen start accepting envelopes of cash. His argument, in the pages of The Atlantic, no less, was that American politics had become so terrified of corruption that it had eliminated some of the perfectly legal bribery that once made government function properly. This included pork, earmarks and patronage.

As this was a very different and simpler time, it might have involved a bridge here, an irrigation project there, rather than a humming data center. Rauch borrowed an old Tammany Hall phrase for it: “Honest graft.” Twelve years later, Trump decided that Rauch simply wasn’t thinking big enough. Newsweek readers, however, were appalled.

Thomas Foster simply asked: “Can you really offer to buy votes?” Others called it “offensive,” “highly illegal” and “the single dumbest idea I’ve ever heard from a public policymaker.” For sheer creativity, it was hard to beat Dawn McCullough: “He’s giving me back the tariff money that I paid. That’s rich.” I sympathize. The proposal would be enormously, prohibitively expensive, not to mention inflationary.

And dangling $5,000 before voters shortly before an election does possess a certain Tammany Hall quality. But let’s take a brief trip back in time to Georgia. Control of the Senate rests on two runoffs.

President Joe Biden tells voters that electing Democrats Jon Ossoff (co-star of this week’s cover story) and Raphael Warnock will mean an end to the Capitol Hill blockage of $2,000 stimulus checks. Democrats won both seats. Ossoff and Warnock subsequently cast decisive votes for Biden’s $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, including $1,400 checks, because the administration somewhat controversially counted the previous $600 stimulus payment toward the $2,000.

Ossoff’s own office celebrated that the legislation had been possible only because Georgia voters elected them. Of course, the country was emerging from a pandemic and, at the time, Trump himself had demanded $2,000 checks too. And Biden’s proposal wasn’texplicitly branded the Joe Biden Vote Democrat and Receive Cash Bonanza.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story