Understanding and supporting university students’ use of distributed practice via implementation intentions

Effective learning strategies like distributed practice are essential for lifelong learning, yet students struggle to apply them consistently due to habitually using ineffective strategies and poor time-management. Setting goals of when and how to incorporate effective strategies could help bridge the gap between intention and behavior. We tested a goal-directed planning intervention using implementation intentions to support students in integrating distributed practice within their self-regulated learning and examined how self-regulated learning unfolds within students’ authentic context.

We tracked daily study behavior of 87 university students (k = 1623) via experience sampling over a four-week course. Implementation intentions did not increase use of distributed practice. However, students who formulated implementation intentions reported shorter study durations, lower effort, and greater concentration during exam week, suggesting more efficient studying.

Regardless of the intervention, students adapted to exam proximity by studying longer, reporting higher effort, satisfaction, extrinsic motivation, and more retrieval-based learning strategies. These findings provide longitudinal insights into how students regulate their learning over time and highlight assessment as a key driver of study behavior. We thank our participants for their time-commitment and input.

This work was funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) (VIDI grant number VI.Vidi.195.135) awarded to Anique de Bruin. The funder played no other role than financial support. The artificial intelligence tool Chat GPT 4.0 was used during the preparation of this manuscript.

The authors used it for improving readability and language of this article. All generated output was reviewed and edited before inclusion in this manuscript. Department of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands Louise David, Felicitas Biwer & Anique de Bruin Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.